![]() It was not immediately clear where Khan was taken. "NAB is an independent body and not under government control." "This arrest is in accordance with the law," he said. Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah said Khan had been arrested by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), the country's top anti-corruption body. "They beat him and dragged him out," he told AFP. "As we reached the court's biometric room to mark the attendance, dozens of rangers attacked us," said Ali Bukhari, a lawyer with Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. Video broadcast on local TV channels showed Khan - who has a pronounced limp since being shot during an assassination attempt last year - being manhandled by dozens of paramilitary rangers into an armoured car inside the Islamabad High Court premises. Khan faces dozens of charges since being ousted - a tactic analysts say successive Pakistan governments have used to silence their opponents. Police fired tear gas and water cannon to disperse Khan supporters in Karachi and Lahore, while protesters blocked roads in the capital Islamabad, Peshawar, and other cities. ![]() ![]() Some protesters took out their wrath on the military, storming the residence of the corps commander in Lahore and laying siege to a gate of the army's general headquarters in the garrison city of Rawalpindi. His arrest follows months of political crisis and came hours after the powerful military rebuked the former international cricketer for alleging that a senior officer had been involved in a plot to kill him. In setting a fine, the court may conclude that the offender is able to pay any fine imposed unless the offender has supplied financial information to the contrary.Protests erupted across Pakistan on Tuesday after former prime minister Imran Khan was arrested during a court appearance in the capital for one of dozens of cases pending since he was ousted last year. In the absence of such disclosure, or where the court is not satisfied that it has been given sufficient reliable information, the court will be entitled to draw reasonable inferences as to the offender’s means from evidence it has heard and from all the circumstances of the case. If necessary, the court may compel the disclosure of an individual offender’s financial circumstances pursuant to section 35 of the Sentencing Code. Obtaining financial information: It is for the offender to disclose to the court such data relevant to their financial position as will enable it to assess what they can reasonably afford to pay.The court should ensure that the effect of the fine (particularly if it will result in closure of the business) is proportionate to the gravity of the offence. When sentencing organisations the fine must be sufficiently substantial to have a real economic impact which will bring home to both management and shareholders the need to comply with the law.Where it is not possible to calculate or estimate the economic benefit, the court may wish to draw on information from the enforcing authorities about the general costs of operating within the law.Where the means of the offender are limited, priority should be given to compensation (where applicable) over payment of any other financial penalty.In considering economic benefit, the court should avoid double recovery.The fine should meet, in a fair and proportionate way, the objectives of punishment, deterrence and the removal of gain derived through the commission of the offence it should not be cheaper to offend than to comply with the law.any gain made as a direct result of the offence.Where possible, if a financial penalty is imposed, it should remove any economic benefit the offender has derived through the commission of the offence including:.The court should determine the appropriate level of fine in accordance with this guideline and section 125 of the Sentencing Code, which requires that the fine must reflect the seriousness of the offence and that the court must take into account the financial circumstances of the offender.Additional note: Availability of ancillary orders.Automatic orders on conviction for sexual offences Forfeiture or suspension of liquor licence Forfeiture and destruction of weapons orders Forfeiture and destruction of goods bearing unauthorised trade mark Disqualification from ownership of animals Disqualification from driving – general power Destruction orders and contingent destruction orders for dogs
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |